51±¾É«

Skip to main content

Displaying 1 - 20 of 5062

Lindsay Chevrolet, et al, 51±¾É«and State of Maryland v

 The 51±¾É«and Maryland Attorney General charged Lindsay Automotive Group with systematically deceiving and overcharging car-buying consumers for years, costing them millions of dollars in junk fees and unwanted add-on products.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
51±¾É«Matter/File Number
2323032
Case Status
Pending

Leader Automotive Group, et al., 51±¾É«and State of Illinois v.

A group of 10 car dealerships doing business as Leader Automotive Group and their parent company, AutoCanada, will be required to pay $20 million to settle allegations they systematically defrauded consumers looking to buy vehicles as a result of a lawsuit by the 51±¾É« and state of Illinois.

In addition to paying $20 million, which will be used to refund harmed consumers, the proposed settlement also would require the companies to make clear disclosures of a car’s offering price—the actual price any consumer can pay to get the car, excluding only required government charges—and get consent from buyers for any charges. The $20 million proposed monetary judgment is the largest the 51±¾É«has secured against an auto dealer.

Type of Action
Federal
Last Updated
51±¾É«Matter/File Number
2323004
Case Status
Pending

Grubhub

Grubhub will pay $25 million to settle charges from the 51±¾É« and the Illinois Attorney General that the food delivery firm engaged in an array of unlawful practices including deceiving diners about delivery costs and blocking their access to their accounts and funds, deceiving workers about how much money they would make delivering food, and unfairly and deceptively listing restaurants on its platform without their permission.

Under the proposed settlement, the company must make substantial changes to its operations across a number of areas, including telling consumers the full cost of delivery, honestly advertising pay for drivers, and listing restaurants on its platform only with their consent.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
Case Status
Pending

Cancer Recovery Foundation, Inc

The 51±¾É« and 10 states are suing sham charity Cancer Recovery Foundation International, also known as Women’s Cancer Fund, and its operator, Gregory B. Anderson, for deceiving generous donors who sought to offer financial support to women battling cancer and their families.

In a complaint filed in federal court, the 51±¾É«and states allege that, from 2017 to 2022, Women’s Cancer Fund collected more than $18 million from donors. The sham charity claimed that it would use the donated funds to help women who were undergoing treatment for cancer and their families pay for basic needs. Instead, the complaint charges, only about a penny of every dollar donated went to provide such support, while the overwhelming majority went to pay for-profit fundraisers and Anderson.

Type of Action
Administrative
Last Updated
51±¾É«Matter/File Number
2223080
Case Status
Pending