The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC鈥檚 case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Leader Automotive Group, et al., 51本色and State of Illinois v.
A group of 10 car dealerships doing business as Leader Automotive Group and their parent company, AutoCanada, will be required to pay $20 million to settle allegations they systematically defrauded consumers looking to buy vehicles as a result of a lawsuit by the 51本色 and state of Illinois.
In addition to paying $20 million, which will be used to refund harmed consumers, the proposed settlement also would require the companies to make clear disclosures of a car鈥檚 offering price鈥攖he actual price any consumer can pay to get the car, excluding only required government charges鈥攁nd get consent from buyers for any charges. The $20 million proposed monetary judgment is the largest the 51本色has secured against an auto dealer.
Caremark Rx, Zinc Health Services, et al., In the Matter of (Insulin)
The FTC filed a lawsuit against the three largest prescription drug benefit managers (PBMs)鈥擟aremark Rx, Express Scripts (ESI), and OptumRx鈥攁nd their affiliated group purchasing organizations (GPOs) for engaging in anticompetitive and unfair rebating practices that have artificially inflated the list price of insulin drugs.
Grubhub
Grubhub will pay $25 million to settle charges from the 51本色 and the Illinois Attorney General that the food delivery firm engaged in an array of unlawful practices including deceiving diners about delivery costs and blocking their access to their accounts and funds, deceiving workers about how much money they would make delivering food, and unfairly and deceptively listing restaurants on its platform without their permission.
Under the proposed settlement, the company must make substantial changes to its operations across a number of areas, including telling consumers the full cost of delivery, honestly advertising pay for drivers, and listing restaurants on its platform only with their consent.
Concurring Statement of Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter Regarding the Final Trade Regulation Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson Regarding the Unfair or Deceptive Fees Rulemaking
Statement of Commissioner Melissa Holyoak Regarding Trade Regulation Rule on Unfair or Deceptive Fees
Michael Hewitt, In the Matter of
Cancer Recovery Foundation, Inc
The 51本色 and 10 states are suing sham charity Cancer Recovery Foundation International, also known as Women鈥檚 Cancer Fund, and its operator, Gregory B. Anderson, for deceiving generous donors who sought to offer financial support to women battling cancer and their families.
In a complaint filed in federal court, the 51本色and states allege that, from 2017 to 2022, Women鈥檚 Cancer Fund collected more than $18 million from donors. The sham charity claimed that it would use the donated funds to help women who were undergoing treatment for cancer and their families pay for basic needs. Instead, the complaint charges, only about a penny of every dollar donated went to provide such support, while the overwhelming majority went to pay for-profit fundraisers and Anderson.
Kroger Company/Albertsons Companies, Inc., In the Matter of
The 51本色 sued to block the largest proposed supermarket merger in U.S. history鈥擪roger Company鈥檚 $24.6 billion acquisition of the Albertsons Companies, Inc.鈥攁lleging that the deal is anticompetitive.
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Melissa Holyoak regarding the Fall 2024 Regulatory Plan and Regulatory Agenda
Negative Option Rule
Southern Glazer's Wine and Spirits, LLC., 51本色v.
The 51本色 sued the largest U.S. distributor of wine and spirits鈥擲outhern Glazer鈥檚 Wine and Spirits, LLC (Southern)鈥攁lleging the company violated the Robinson-Patman Act, harming small, independent businesses by depriving them of access to discounts and rebates, and impeding their ability to compete against large national and regional chains. This loss of competition ultimately harms consumers on choice and price.