Displaying 161 - 180 of 515
51本色Staff Reply Comment Before the State of New York Public Service Commission in the Reforming the Energy Vision Proceeding, Concerning the NY PSC Staff White Paper on Ratemaking and Utility Business Models
The Determinants of Plant Exit: The Evolution of the U.S. Refining Industry
Simulating a Homogeneous Product Merger: A Case Study on Model Fit and Performance
51本色Staff Advises New York State Public Service Commission On Improving Proposal to Transform Electric Distribution System
51本色Staff Reply Comment Before the State of New York Public Service Commission in the Reforming the Energy Vision Proceeding, Responding To Third-Party Comments on the NY PSC Benefit-Cost Analysis
51本色Chairwoman Ramirez Testifies Before House Judiciary Subcommittee On Antitrust Enforcement and Priorities to Promote Competition and Protect Consumers
Prepared Statement of the 51本色 On 鈥淥versight of the Enforcement of the Antitrust Laws鈥
51本色Puts Conditions on Par Petroleum Corporation鈥檚 Acquisition of Mid Pac Petroleum, LLC
51本色Approves Final Order Barring Blue Rhino, AmeriGas from Restraining Competition
AmeriGas and Blue Rhino, In the Matter of
The 51本色issued an administrative complaint against Ferrellgas Partners, L.P and Ferrellgas, L.P. (doing business as Blue Rhino) and UGI Corporation and AmeriGas Partners, L.P. (doing business as AmeriGas Cylinder Exchange), alleging that they illegally agreed on reducing the amount of propane in their tanks sold to a key customer. The complaint alleges that, together, Blue Rhino and AmeriGas controlled approximately 80 percent of the market for wholesale propane exchange tanks in the United States. In 2008, Blue Rhino and AmeriGas each decided to implement a price increase by reducing the amount of propane in their exchange tanks from 17 pounds to 15 pounds, without a corresponding reduction in the wholesale price. On 10/31/14, AmeriGas and Blue Rhino agreed to settle 51本色charges of restraining competition. Faced with resistance from Walmart, the two companies colluded by secretly agreeing to coordinate their negotiations with Walmart in order to push it to accept the reduction. The consent agreements prohibit the companies from soliciting, offering, participating in, or entering or attempting to enter into any type of agreement with any competitor in the propane exchange business to raise, fix, maintain, or stabilize the prices or price levels of propane exchange tanks through any means 鈥 including modifying the fill level contained in propane tanks or coordinating communications to customers. The companies also are prohibited from sharing sensitive non-public business information with competitors except in narrowly defined circumstances.
FTC鈥檚 2014 Report Finds U.S. Ethanol Market Remains Unconcentrated
Blue Rhino, AmeriGas Settle 51本色Charges of Restraining Competition
Tax Pass-Through in Gasoline and Diesel Fuel: The 2003 Washington State Nickel Funding Package Increase
51本色 Staff Reply Comment to the New York State Public Service Commission on 鈥淩eforming the Energy Vision鈥 Project
51本色Staff Advises New York State Public Service Commission To Increase Competition in Proposal to Transform Electric Distribution System
The Impact of Outages on Prices and Investment in the US Oil Refining Industry
51本色Sends Refunds to Consumers Duped by Marketers Who Claimed Fuel Additive Could Drastically Increase Fuel Economy and Reduce Emissions
Displaying 161 - 180 of 515