The legal library gives you easy access to the FTC鈥檚 case information and other official legal, policy, and guidance documents.
Chevron Corporation and Hess Corporation; Analysis of Agreement Containing Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
2410010 Informal Interpretation
2410006 Informal Interpretation
Instant Brands LLC, In the Matter of
The 51本色 has taken action against Instant Brands, manufacturer of Pyrex-brand kitchen and home products, for falsely claiming that all its popular glass measuring cups were made in the United States during a time some measuring cups were imported from China. The FTC鈥檚 proposed order against Instant Brands would stop the company from making deceptive claims about products being 鈥淢ade in USA鈥 and require them to pay a monetary judgment.
The 51本色 is sending more than $88,000 in refunds to consumers who bought Chinese-made measuring cups marketed as 鈥淢ade in USA鈥 by Instant Brands, the maker of Pyrex-brand kitchen and home products.
Top Company Complaints Report - October 2024
Grand Canyon University/Grand Canyon Education
The 51本色alleges that Grand Canyon Education (GCE), Inc., Grand Canyon University (GCU) and Brian Mueller鈥攖he CEO of GCE and president of GCU鈥攄eceived prospective doctoral students about the cost and course requirements of its doctoral programs and about being a nonprofit, while also engaging in deceptive and abusive telemarketing practices.
Chevron/Hess, In the Matter of
The 51本色 took action to resolve antitrust concerns related to Chevron Corporation鈥檚 acquisition of rival oil producer Hess Corporation by approving a proposed consent order that would prohibit Chevron from appointing Hess CEO John B. Hess to its Board of Directors.
The FTC鈥檚 complaint alleges that Mr. Hess communicated publicly and privately with the past and current Secretaries General of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and an official from Saudi Arabia. In these communications, Mr. Hess stressed the importance of oil market stability and inventory management and encouraged these officials to take actions on these issues and speak about them at different events, the complaint alleges.
DoNotPay, Inc..; Analysis of Proposed Consent Order To Aid Public Comment
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension (COPPA Rule)
2409006 Informal Interpretation
Invitation Homes Inc., 51本色v.
The 51本色 is taking action against Invitation Homes, the country鈥檚 largest landlord of single-family homes, for an array of unlawful actions against consumers, including deceiving renters about lease costs, charging undisclosed junk fees, failing to inspect homes before residents moved in, and unfairly withholding tenants鈥 security deposits when they moved out.
Invitation Homes has agreed to a proposed settlement order that would require the company to turn over $48 million to be used to refund consumers harmed by its actions. The corporate landlord will also be required to clearly disclose its leasing prices, establish policies and procedures to handle security deposit refunds fairly, and stop other unlawful behavior.
FBA Machine
The 51本色took action against a business opportunity scheme that allegedly falsely promised consumers that they would make guaranteed income through online storefronts that utilized AI-powered software. According to the FTC, the scheme, which has operated under the names Passive Scaling and FBA Machine, cost consumers more than $15.9 million based on deceptive earnings claims that rarely, if ever, materialize.
As a result of the FTC鈥檚 complaint, a federal court issued an order temporarily halting the scheme and putting it under the control of a receiver. The case against the scheme is still under way and will be decided by a federal court.
Dissenting Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson Joined by Commissioner Melissa Holyoak In the Matter of Rytr LLC
Concurring Statement of Commissioner Andrew N. Ferguson In the Matter of DoNotPay, Inc.
Empire Holdings Group LLC, et al. 51本色v.
The 51本色has charged a business opportunity scheme with falsely claiming to help consumers build an 鈥淎I-powered Ecommerce Empire鈥 by participating in its training programs that can cost almost $2,000 or by buying a 鈥渄one for you鈥 online storefront for tens of thousands of dollars. The scheme, known as Ecommerce Empire Builders (EEB), claims consumers can potentially make millions of dollars, but the FTC鈥檚 complaint alleges that those profits fail to materialize.
As a result of the FTC鈥檚 complaint, a federal court issued an order temporarily halting the scheme and putting it under the control of a receiver. The FTC鈥檚 case against the scheme is ongoing and will be decided by a federal court.